What the evidence cannot show

Separate an observation from its cause

CLM always chose Hold in the tested MPS configuration. That observation does not isolate whether the model, task representation, implementation or their interaction caused it. Hosted and local timing mixes hardware, framework, networking and provider conditions. A larger GLM completion cap could alter several outcomes, but this run does not estimate them.

Inspect the reference limitation

All erroneous allows fell among eleven pre-run changed references. The review treats an unestablished condition as requiring Hold. Some unchanged Allow cases also leave conditions implicit: C270 mentions owner-approved purchase in its rule without separately affirming approval in the facts; C164 requires verified queue length but states that the trigger is exceeded. The review does not establish consistent treatment of every such wording.

These examples identify an unresolved reference-consistency issue. They do not supply newly adjudicated labels. The reference remains frozen, and a scored error means disagreement with that key.

The case bank was AI-drafted and single-author reviewed. One case-level bootstrap does not account for shared authorship, scenario similarity, alternative reasonable readings or repeated-run variation. No proposed action was executed, and neither correctness nor certainty certifies deployment safety.