# Riding Through the Cybersecurity Fog: What We See and What We Miss

> The article argues that cybersecurity risk assessment should be evidence-based rather than driven by geopolitical bias.

[Canonical HTML page](https://trustcyber.ca/insights/cybersecurity-fog-geopolitical-risk/)

- Author: Junior Williams
- Type: Insight brief
- Published: 2025-02-07
- Modified: 2025-02-07
- Topics: Cybersecurity risk, Geopolitics

## What this examines

The article argues that cybersecurity risk assessment should be evidence-based rather than driven by geopolitical bias. The article contrasts attention to possible foreign AI data transmission with confirmed domestic breaches and operationalized surveillance practices.

## Why it matters

The source's durable point is that mass data collection, AI-driven surveillance, and algorithmic manipulation should be scrutinized consistently regardless of national origin or whether the actor is public, private, foreign, or domestic.

## Key ideas

- Theoretical foreign threats can receive disproportionate scrutiny compared with confirmed domestic failures.
- AI risk categories such as manipulation, social scoring, biometric surveillance, and deceptive techniques should be applied consistently.
- Surveillance and data exploitation are not exclusive to any one country.
- A compromised system is a compromised system regardless of the actor's flag.

## Resources

- [Read the original on LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/riding-through-cybersecurity-fog-what-we-see-miss-junior-williams-rhf3c/)